Alpízar, F. Carlsson, F. Johansson Stenman, O.
Anonymity, reciprocity,and conformity: evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica - Gothenburg, Suecia Elsevier 2008 - 24 páginas : 1 ilustración, 3 tablas - Discussion paper series (EfD) .
Incluye 40 referencias bibliográficas en las páginas 1056-1060
We investigate the role of anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity for voluntary contributions, based on a natural fieldexperiment conducted at a national park in Costa Rica. Contributions made in public in front of the solicitor are 25% higher thancontributions made in private. Giving subjects a small gift before requesting a contribution increases the likelihood of a positivecontribution. At the same time, the conditional contribution decreases. The total effect of giving a gift is positive but small, andtaking the cost of the gift into account, it is far from profitable. When the subjects are told that the typical contribution of others is$2 (a small contribution), the probability of a contribution increases and the conditional contribution decreases, compared withproviding no reference information. Providing a high reference level ($10) increases the conditional contributions. Overall, the totaleffects have the expected signs, although the magnitudes are smaller than what one might have expected based on existing evidencefrom laboratory experiments.
PARQUES NACIONALES
INVESTIGACION
FINANCIAMIENTO
SUBSIDIOS
EXPERIMENTACION EN CAMPO
COSTA RICA
Anonymity, reciprocity,and conformity: evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica - Gothenburg, Suecia Elsevier 2008 - 24 páginas : 1 ilustración, 3 tablas - Discussion paper series (EfD) .
Incluye 40 referencias bibliográficas en las páginas 1056-1060
We investigate the role of anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity for voluntary contributions, based on a natural fieldexperiment conducted at a national park in Costa Rica. Contributions made in public in front of the solicitor are 25% higher thancontributions made in private. Giving subjects a small gift before requesting a contribution increases the likelihood of a positivecontribution. At the same time, the conditional contribution decreases. The total effect of giving a gift is positive but small, andtaking the cost of the gift into account, it is far from profitable. When the subjects are told that the typical contribution of others is$2 (a small contribution), the probability of a contribution increases and the conditional contribution decreases, compared withproviding no reference information. Providing a high reference level ($10) increases the conditional contributions. Overall, the totaleffects have the expected signs, although the magnitudes are smaller than what one might have expected based on existing evidencefrom laboratory experiments.
PARQUES NACIONALES
INVESTIGACION
FINANCIAMIENTO
SUBSIDIOS
EXPERIMENTACION EN CAMPO
COSTA RICA