| 000 | 01902naa a22004337a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c18437 _d18437 |
||
| 003 | CR-SiIICA | ||
| 005 | 20230606062800.0 | ||
| 006 | a|||||r|||| 00| 0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 930101e1987 cr |||||r|||| 00| | eng d | ||
| 022 | _a0534-0591 | ||
| 040 |
_cCR-SiIICA _aCR-SiIICA _bEs |
||
| 041 |
_aeng _beng |
||
| 090 |
_aIICA _bPM-A4/BR 87-006 |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_9122014 _aStrauss, J. _eautor/a |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aDefinition for an ex-post evaluation system for PROCENSUL II |
| 260 |
_aBrasilia, DF (Brasil): _bIICA, _c1987 |
||
| 270 | _aCIDIA, San José (Costa Rica) | ||
| 300 |
_a12 páginas: _b1 tabla |
||
| 440 |
_aPublicações Miscelâneas A4-BR (IICA) _x0534-0591 _v; no. 87-006 _9170799 |
||
| 520 | _aThe consultant explains that an important part of the evaluation procedures for the PROCENSUL II project consists of a series of baseline farm surveys done separately in each of the national program centers in the PROCENSUL II region, and planned follow up surveys. The follow up activities are designed to be longitudinal, lasting two years or so, and intensive, with monthly household visitations. These follow up are organized first around the baseline surveys, and second around the proposed follow up surveys. It concludes with observations on each center visited or talked with a representative of. (MIBA) | ||
| 690 |
_9147306 _aEVALUACION EX-POST |
||
| 690 |
_9147455 _aEXPLOTACIONES AGRARIAS |
||
| 710 | 2 |
_99663 _aIICA, Brasilia, DF (Brasil) |
|
| 710 |
_aEmpresa Brasileira de Investigación Agropecuaria (EMBRAPA) _cBrasilia, Brasil _97343 |
||
| 856 |
_qpdf _uhttps://repositorio.iica.int/handle/11324/12625 _yeng |
||
| 901 |
_aA50 _b18009 |
||
| 902 | _aE16 | ||
| 903 | _aV | ||
| 904 | _aIICA | ||
| 905 | _aC | ||
| 906 | _a19930101 | ||
| 907 | _aCIDIA, San José (Costa Rica) | ||
| 908 | _aB | ||
| 909 | _aMS | ||
| 912 | _aeng | ||
| 942 | _cIMP | ||