000			02211naa a22005177a 4500
003			CR-SiIICA
005			20200203204152.0
006			a|||||r|||| 00| 0
007			ta
008			150101e cr |||||r|||| 00| | eng d
040			_cCR-SiIICA
041			_aeng _beng
090			_aIICA-E71 40
100			_9103937 _aPearson, B.
110			_912790 _aInternational Policy Council on Agriculture Food and Trade, Washington, D.C. (EUA)
110			_912790 _aInternational Policy Council on Agriculture, Food and Trade, Washington, D.C. (EUA)
111			_932786 _a21. IPC Plenary Meeting and Seminar on the FTAA, APEC and Agricultural Trade Reform _cWashington, D.C. (EUA) _d21-21 May 1998
245			_aThe Asian crisis and the future of APEC an australian agricultural perspective
245			_aProceedings
260			_aWashington, D.C. (EUA) _c1998
270			_a*CIDIA, San José (Costa Rica)
300			_ap. 29-33
520			_aFirst, there is APEC, a regional grouping which defies most of the traditional categories and descriptions. It is a regional body, but one committed to the MFN principle rather than preferential approaches. It has no hard rules, no legally binding commitments, yet is presently engaged in serious-minded negotiations abount actual liberalization, albeit liberalization which, if achieved, will be probably be eventually consumated in the WTO. Perhaps because of these contradictions, APEC is also often under-estimated. Although APEC is an institution that often dissappoints its supporters, it equally frequently confounds its critics
650			_9142716 _aCRISIS ASIATICA
650			_9141261 _aCOMERCIO INTERNACIONAL
650			_9156516 _aOMC
650			_9136221 _aAPEC
650			_9153058 _aLIBRE COMERCIO
650			_9134398 _aACUERDOS COMERCIALES
650			_iINTERNATIONAL TRADE
650			_iWTO
650			_iTRADE AGREEMENTS
650			_fCOMMERCE INTERNATIONAL
650			_fOMC
650			_fACCORD COMMERCIAL
901			_aE71 _b26218
903			_aV
904			_aIICA
905			_aC
907			_a*CIDIA, San José (Costa Rica)
908			_aB
909			_aAMS
912			_aeng
942			_cSER
942			_cIMP
999			_c20771 _d20771